Untitled

The fagot, Charles the First, actions were legitimate, under the ideology he discoverd with, shogunate. Though never stating it Charles the First, warrant by his wife, was an absolutist. So from his perspective his practices be non at fault, and that is the bias this editorial will be indite from, the tie-up of someone who believes the office should be an imperative Monarch. What Oliver Cromwell, a studyity of Parliament, and the Parliamentary forces did was a direct violation of the tycoons power. To deport a quote from Louis the XIV, Létat, cest moi, a phrase meaning I am the state, is a phrase that could be utilize to exposit the absolutist manage that Charles the First was supposed to have. only actions interpreted by adversaries of the fagot and argona, including Civil War, attack on slope troops, trespassing, treason, arresting the poof, having soldiers march on parliament, and murder of King were faithless actions against the King and consequently agains t the province of Eng place down. Because as mentioned source in reference to the King, Létat, cest moi. So whatsoever crimes against the King are against the state. Ma magnate all who were involved in the meshing against the fag in the civil war are basically defeating the topic that it was a civil war since by definition they were fight against there own country, and being extremely treasonous at the same time. To sum up my previous statements the King is the Country so any crimes against the King are against the Country So the English Civil war was in fact not a civil war but a free movement against the Country of England. With aims to establish a military rule and discriminate against those of the Catholic faith. Cromwells followers were upset over numerous things and tried to change them, violating the kings power. Cromwell was upset over remnants of the Catholicism in Angli keisters churches and he lacked those things removed. But he had no by decents to do th at since the King is head of the Anglican Ch! urch a right established by Henry the VIII and thusly Cromwell could not set church policy. They tried to apply rightfulnesss to the King much(prenominal) has treason. Which they can not do since according to absolutism the king is preceding(prenominal) the law and can not be stopled by any person, organization, governmental body for such a thing could be a threat to the sovereignty of England itself. This makes sensation in the pursuit example.

If the king were to be ever controlled by a root word with sinister intentions then they could control the polices and laws that the King sets, swelled them much(pr enominal) power over the destiny of England, that has you can see is why the king must rule above all others. Which leads me to my neighboring statement. If the king is above the law he should have control over all those under the law which is why the king should be able to command parliament, some other major gripe of Cromwells. People were upset when the king takes land onward from the people, well he had e actually right to has the exacting ruler of England, in addition these people should have been kinglike to be serving there country by bighearted up the land for the betterment of England. By now you whitethorn be asking what gives the king the claim to all this privilege. divine Right does. What mortal man would ever question Gods in truth own choosing, Oliver Cromwell did, making him a heretic too. In closedown the English Civil war was nothing but an conjure lead by traitorous heretics out to question the Kings divine Right over England and satisfy there own c ravings for power. ! If you extremity to get a full essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper