Tuesday, January 15, 2019
Sassoon vs Brooke
One, views on war were vastly different amongst the population. The soldiers on the foregoing line saw the world through deferent eyes comp bed to the commonwealth at stead. Some attitudes were based on experience and pain, whilst others on the theme of patriotism and blind belief. They, by Serried Swanson, is a simple and identify metrical composition decrying the righteous establishment send men to die in a so- foretelled noble cause. Caissons bitterness against the war is made ready through his poetry, which is filled with his resentment against war, the futility of it and the high price that had to be paid.Swanson uses gayy an(prenominal) different ways to convey his feelings, and particularly his bitterness and resentment towards the war and the officers, but his true meanings are clear and he writes In such a way that shows clearly what he thinks and feels about the war. The Bishop represents the pompous yield waiving establishment without a clue to the horrors of the battlefield. They are the boys at the front. The term they get out not be the same Is Ironic and true. There Is the Inference that the boys bequeath transcendInto some grace-Like state for having fought and sacrificed In a Just cause. Swanson knew the boys, those who survived, who would return sept changed for far darker and haunting reasons. The elites running the war thought nothing of sending troops to their ends back and forth. The sentiment sold to the populace back home was that it was the Just cause and it was a noble thing to turn in ch entirely toldenged death resulting in new right to breed an honorable race. The second stanza so far is Caissons blunt and harsh retort of reality. It is a brief roll call of injury and disease.Syphilis ran rampant among the boys engaging random relationships and Swanson employs this as Illustration in mocking the Bishop as the disease Is hardly a righteous or noble means of death. The voices against the war cry out Youll not r ecoup a chap whos served that hasnt found some change, and not In a good way. The final line exposes the hypocrisy. The ways of God are strange is the blind ignorance of the excuses. Rupert Brooke also wrote about war but in a much different light. He has a very peremptory outlook on war and a very strong ultranationalistic love of Eng undercoat.In fact in The Soldier he praises the wonderful land of England (gave, once, her flowers to love, her ways to roam, A body of Englands breathing English air). In secernate with Swanson, Brooke adopts a natural positive attitude think only of me as this That theres some corner of a foreign field. as a man who accepts that his survival is not guaranteed and death In defending his country would fabricate him complete. The language used reflects his feelings. He only ever uses wiz ban word, evil, and even this Is used in the context of being put d take away.It is almost an ode to England itself In that rich image-evoking language (her flowers to love, her ways to roam. ) The poem is a sonnet which is a style traditionally used by people writing love poetry. In this case Brooke is using the sonnet melodic line to express his love for his country. The break of thought allows the reader to have time to think about the poets words and absorb them in. The writer moves from one scene he is describing, England being a trial creation of sweetie (her flowers to love, her lands to roam), on to England being alive, personifying England (A pulse in the imperishable mind).Yet there is a continuing presence of the importance and fountain of England, and this is shown by the use of words such as richer, blest by sun and English Heaven. The physique, structure and choice of language all work together. Brooks poems have been associated with the idealistic attitudes prevalent in the years booster cable up to 1914 and the outbreak of war in this sense, his poetry is actually re-war, dissimilar Caissons verse, which is duri ng the war, and speaks less of ideals and more of realism. However, war is a common thread for all writers to use. As Swanson pointed out, there will always be war, and as massive as there is war there will be someone to write about it. Poets express their protest or support through their writing. War poetry can also be a form of propaganda. Caissons was traditional propaganda opposing war while Brooks was a positive form of propaganda. Each man had very strong opinions based on their own personal experience.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment