Reflections on the Analytic/Continental Divide Essay -- Research Essay

Reflections on the Analytic/Continental DivideMy friends in the English department often ask me to formulate the difference I so often talk about betwixt uninflected and continental philosophy. For some odd reason they want to name our discipline with theirs in an effort, maybe, to understand both better. Thus, I welcome the fortune offered by Schuylkills general theme this year to give a rattling general and un-rigorous presentation on Philosophy, intended for the University Community at large. one(a) fine, if annoying, tradition in philosophy is that of hedging our bets. Its the fine art of cosmos slippery. And we actu totallyy think its motivated by a wish to be exacting. Accordingly, I should begin such a paper by maxim that neither analytic nor continental philosophy are truly cohesive, unified, groups overmuch which seems inconsistent flows under their banner, as does much disagreement. However, today, few groups of any be are cohesive and unified, if they ever were . Even science isnt unified any more. So much for fine print bordering on the platitudinous. This paper has intravenous feeding sections. The first section places analytic and continental philosophy within a historical tradition, specifically in relation to Kant. The second details analytic philosophy, particularly with relation to the linguistic turn and ordinary vocabulary philosophy. The third juxtaposes what I take to be a continental response in terms of Heideggers view of language and Foucaults view of power/knowledge, and shows some of the disrepute in which these are held. The expire reviews some recent journal articles on the subject, and delivers a summation and prognosis. I. You all know about the Pre-Socratics, of which I think fondly of Heraclitus, so o... ...of light Reason. Trans. Norman Kemp Smith. invigorated York St. Martins, 1965. Grounding for the Metaphysics of Morals. Trans. James W. Ellington. Indianapolis Hackett, 1977. Margolis, Joseph. Historied thou ght Constructed World. Berkeley U of California P, 1995. A Biopsy of Recent Analytic Philosophy. The Philosophical fabrication XXVI.3 (1995) 161-188. McDowell, John. Mind and World. Cambridge Harvard UP, 1994. Norris, Christopher. Doubting Castle or the Slough of Despond Davidson and Schiffer on the Limits of Analysis. The Review of Metaphysics 50 (December 1996) 351-82. Quine, Willard Van Orman. Two Dogmas of Empiricism. The Philosophy of Language. Ed. A.P. Martinich. New York Oxford UP, 1996. 39-60. Schlick, Morris. The Turning Point in Philosophy. Logical Positivism. Ed. A. J. Ayer. New York Free, 1959. qtd. in Follesdal (200).