Example a Level Psychology Experiment Essay

Hypothesis at that place will be a substantive positive relationship between the lots on a reposition strain and scored on a quiz to predict your chance of macrocosm a millionaireNull Hypothesis there will be no significant relationship between scores on a reminiscence test and scores on a test measuring the chances of neat a millionaire and any relationship is due to chanceMethod excogitation the method of the experiment was a coefficient of correlational shoot this was apply in order to see whether there was a relationship between the scores on a memory board test and scores on a millionaire test. The experiment used co vari sufficients, which were the score on the memory test and score on the millionaire test. Controls in order ensure the test was original the extraneous variables needed to be controlled. Standardised instructions were used as a control to give completely role players the same instructions during the experiment, which call upt that the exper imenter did non affect the communication of the instructions by changing them for each participant which reduces the amount on experimenter bias. A further control that was used was victimisation anonymous data by assigning each participant a number to record that data on a table, rather than utilize individuals names. Participants the target population for the experiment were young multitude in the Gosport atomic number 18a of each gender. The sampling method was an opportunity render of 10 students aged 17-18 both males and females (2 males and 8 females) at Bay phratry ordinal Form from an A Level Psychology class and the researcher was a Psychology teacher at Bay House Sixth Form.Apparatus and Materials the materials used for the experiment were a list of 34 row created by the researcher that were projected onto the board, paper and pens provided for the participants to record the number of manner of speaking they remembered, a watch to time the one arcsecond perio d of c every last(predicate) up and writing down the speech, an online questionnaire to measure likelihood of becoming a millionaire at bbc.co.uk/science/humanbody/surveys/millionaire1/index.shtml Procedure the participants were firstly given an explanation of the research and what the national would entail for them.They were them given the equipment they required to off the memory test whilst be anonymous and were given standardise instructions by the researcher of how to complete the test and the rules of the research. The participants were then(prenominal) shown the list of 34 words to memorise by projecting the list on the board and where given one minute to memorise as many words as possible. The words were then hidden and the researcher projected instructions to the participants to write down all the words they remembered and they were given one minute to do so.The number of words memorised were recorded by the researcher by assigning each participant with a number and they stated out loud their score. The participants were then asked to hightail it to a computer room to complete an online survey to test their likelihood of becoming a millionaire, after they completed the questionnaire the participants had to record their score contiguous to their memory score on a board. The participants were then debriefed by the researcher. ethics there were few ethical issues in the experiment as aware harmonize was gained by the researcher to ensure the participants were given instructions and the repel of the research.Therefore, there was no deception in the research and so the faithfulness of the admit was intact during the memory and millionaire tests. Furthermore, all the participants were over 16 and so there was no need for the researcher to obtain parental consent for the study. Participants were overly given the right to withdraw before and during the research, so the participants were non pressured to take part or complete the study if th ey were not cosy with the terms of the research or what the data was being used for. However, there may be ethical issues regarding the rise upbeing of the participants during the research as the study may perk up caused stress or anxiety in the participants when finish the memory or millionaire tests because they may feel the pressure to do well in each test, although the research was anonymous and so this may have reduced the amount of stress caused by the study.Scatter Graph for dataThe scatter graph shows that there is a weak negative correlation between memory test scores and millionaire test scores, which delegacy that it does not necessrily prove our hypothesis that there will be a significant postive relationship between the ii co variables. Therefore, the hypothesis needs to be rejected and the null hypothesis can be accepted as the null hypotehsis reflects what our results show on the scatter graph. The graph can also help identify outliers, as the partipant that sc ored significantly higher on the memory test and lower on this millionaire test could be regarded as an outlier as it does not follow the pattern of the other data found from the research.military ratingDesign the design that was used in this research was correlational, which is good as allows us to identify if there is a relationship between two co variables as well as allowing research to be conducted that cannot be done in a lab experiment as is would not be viable. However, correlational studies do not show cause and topic between the two co variables and so it cannot be stated that having a good memory will cause a person to draw a millionaire in the future as it could just as intimately be that being a millionaire causes a person to have a good memory. Sample the audition that as used in this study was very small, as only 10 people took part in the research also the participants were psychology students. Therefore due to the small ingest and the specific type of partici pant the results may not be able to be generalised to the wider population. Furthermore, gender may havebeen an issue with the sample as there were only 2 males, whereas there were 8 females, therefore there was not an equal mix of each gender and so the results cannot be generalised.Tests the tests that were used in the study were a memory test created by the researcher and an online questionnaire to predict that chance that the participants would have of becoming a millionaire. The memory test was good as it used standardised instructions, subject matter that the test was more reliable as the same instructions were shown to all participants at the same time, which reduces the amount on researcher bias and means that participants can query any confusion they have. Moreover, the standardise instructions mean that there is high control in the research and so the results are reliable. The millionaire test may have had some issues as the closed questions that were used may have not p rovided an applicable answer, resulting in participants answering questions wrongly which may have an effect on the results.